Write proposals and quotes faster

Every proposal is written from scratch in a document, takes half a day, and you have no idea whether the client ever opened it.

Tools worth considering

Copy.ai

Go-to-market AI platform combining a multi-model chat with automated workflows, priced with generous seat counts rather than per user.

No free plan; Chat $29/mo billed monthly or $24/mo billed annually ($288/yr) with 5 seats and unlimited words; Growth $1,000/mo ($12,000/yr) with 75 seats and 20K workflow credits/mo; Expansion $2,000/mo with 150 seats and 45K credits; Scale $3,000/mo with 200 seats and 75K credits; Enterprise on request

Visit Copy.ai

PandaDoc

Document platform for proposals, quotes and contracts, with e-signatures, templates, approval workflows and recipient analytics.

Free plan: 60 documents per year, 5 legally binding eSignatures per month, up to 5 templates, drag-and-drop editor, real-time tracking; Starter $19/seat/mo billed annually; Business $49/seat/mo billed annually; Enterprise priced per seat or per document on request; annual billing saves up to 46%

Visit PandaDoc

Jasper

AI content platform for marketing teams, with brand voices, agents for marketing workflows and a browser extension that works where you write.

No free plan; 7-day free trial. Pro $69/month/seat billed monthly or $59/month/seat billed annually, including 2 Brand Voices; Business on request with unlimited voices, API access and a custom agent builder

Visit Jasper

The problem

For most service businesses the proposal is the bottleneck between interest and revenue. It takes hours, it happens in the evening because the day was full of delivery, and it goes out slower than it should. Deals cool while they are being written.

The content is also more repetitive than it feels. Roughly seventy per cent of a proposal is the same every time: how you work, what the stages are, terms, timelines, the standard caveats. It gets rewritten anyway because it lives inside the last document rather than as reusable pieces.

Then it disappears. A PDF goes by email and nothing comes back. You do not know whether it was read, which section they lingered on, or whether it reached the person who decides. So the follow-up is a guess.

What AI can actually do here

Three separable jobs, and it is worth buying only the ones you need.

Assembly is the biggest time saver: content blocks and a pricing table you combine rather than retype, with the client-specific part being the only thing you write. Approval routing handles the case where a discount needs someone else’s agreement.

Tracking is the underrated one. Knowing that the proposal was opened three times and that someone spent a while on the pricing page changes what you say when you follow up, and it tells you when the deal has gone quiet versus when it was never read.

Writing help is where models fit. Drafting the tailored section from your notes, tightening a paragraph, producing a summary for the decision-maker who will not read eleven pages. Keep the pricing and the commitments under your own control, because a generated number in a document a client can accept is a contract you did not intend.

How the tools differ

PandaDoc is the proposal platform and where most of this lives. The free plan covers 60 documents per year, 5 legally binding eSignatures per month, up to 5 templates, the editor and real-time tracking, which is enough for a small business sending a proposal a fortnight. Starter is $19 per seat per month billed annually and Business $49, with annual billing saving up to 46%. It connects to HubSpot, Pipedrive, Stripe and Slack.

Jasper is the writing layer for teams that need consistent tone across a lot of output. No free plan, 7-day trial. Pro is $69 per seat monthly or $59 billed annually, including 2 Brand Voices. That price only makes sense if writing is a substantial part of the week.

Copy.ai is the cheaper writing option with an unusual shape: Chat at $29 per month monthly or $24 annually includes 5 seats with unlimited words. For a small team that need writing help occasionally, the seat count is the value.

When you don't need a tool

If you send two proposals a year, a good template document is the answer. Buying software to send two documents is not.

If your proposals are genuinely bespoke every time, templating fights the work. What helps then is tracking and signature, not assembly.

If you write well and quickly, skip the writing tools entirely and buy only the document platform. The time is going into layout and chasing, not prose.

Once it is agreed, send the same contract repeatedly without retyping it covers what comes next.

Get advice for your situation

Your AI consultant

Free · no signup · advice first

An example

I waste hours every week going back and forth to schedule client calls.
You don't need a big system for this. There's an easier tool for this: Calendly. On the free plan you share one link and clients pick a slot that syncs with your calendar. Paid starts at $10/user/mo, but you likely won't need it.

Your turn

So, what can I help you with? Describe your situation in your own words, the way you would explain it to someone at the next table.Not sure where to start? Tell me what your business does and what eats your week, and we'll work out together where a tool would actually help.

Or start with a question people ask about this:

By chatting you agree to our terms.

Frequently asked questions

Can a proposal double as the contract?

Often yes, if it contains the terms and is signed. That is how these platforms are usually used, and it removes a step. For anything substantial or unusual, have the terms checked once by someone qualified and then reuse them as a block.

Is the free plan enough?

PandaDoc’s free tier gives 60 documents a year and 5 signatures a month with real-time tracking, which covers a business sending roughly one proposal a week. The limit that bites first is signatures per month, not documents per year.

Should AI write the whole proposal?

No. Use it for the standard narrative sections and the summary, and write the parts that describe their situation and your price yourself. A proposal that reads as generated undermines exactly the impression it exists to create.

What does open tracking actually tell me?

That it arrived and was read, roughly when, and which sections held attention. It does not tell you the decision. Use it to time the follow-up rather than to interpret intent, because a long look at the pricing page can mean interest or alarm.